Questions around stablecoins, particularly Tether, have been knocking around in financial circles for months, for instance, are they as stable as they ought to be? A majority have raised questions about Tether as a possible systemic risk to the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
On 9 August, Tether put out an attestation about its reserves, as a way of reassuring users that the most popular stablecoin is, well, stable. Was that reassuring? Apparently, not enough. Thereafter, a series of controversies have gripped Tether’s executives. Here’s the latest development in that story.
New class-action lawsuit
Tether has been hit with a new class-action lawsuit. Plaintiffs Matthew Anderson and Shawn Dolifka filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Tether tokens are backed one-to-one by sufficient reserves in U.S dollars. Each token is backed by one U.S dollar. Is that really the case? Not if the plaintiffs are to be believed. It further noted the following,
“Two regulatory agencies, the New York State Attorney General and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission found that Defendants had misrepresented the backing of Tether tokens and in fact, Defendants did not maintain the same amount of reserves as Tether tokens in circulation. At times, Defendants had no reserves whatsoever.”
More accusations followed such as, the company continues with its “unlawful and deceptive” practices. That it lied about its stablecoin being backed one-to-one by sufficient dollar reserves and “suppressed” information about failing to undergo routine audits, Further,
“The above unfair and deceptive acts and practices by Defendants were immoral, unethical, oppressive, and unscrupulous.”
Therefore, this indicates a breach of contract. According to the plaintiffs, the aforesaid actions entitles them to “compensatory and consequential damages,” the amount of which will be determined at trial.
Needless to say, the accused say otherwise. Tether responded to the “nonsense, copycat” lawsuit, claiming that it will aggressively litigate its “meritless claims.” The official response was published on Twitter.
Last Friday another nonsense, copycat lawsuit was filed by 2 Plaintiffs and their law firm looking for a payout based on meritless claims. We will aggressively litigate and dispense with the action in due course. https://t.co/u5qemzvVTM
— Tether (@Tether_to) December 13, 2021
In short, this wasn’t the first time this has happened. Certainly not for Tether and its executives. In October, Tether paid a $41 million fine to the CFTC after being accused by the regulator of making misleading statements about the flagship USDT stablecoin. In another news, it reached another settlement amounting to $18.5 million with New York Attorney General Letitia James over an undisclosed loan.
Overall, the company has had a bumpy ride in the recent times. These concerns were magnified especially after Bloomberg released a controversial article highlighting some of the “shady deals” large Chinese companies have undertaken.
Needless to say, Tether fired back with full guns blazing. The accused saw it as an attempt to perpetuate a false and aging story arc about Tether based on innuendo and misinformation.
Skyhigh.Vip is a global institutional investor with a vast interest in Arts / Construction / Education / Business Services / E-Sports and various other growth industries.
Several of its popular portfolios include GO Chambers which is the world’s largest business chamber listing provider with over 30,000 active chambers as its members.
Flexgigzz is the Asia leading marketplace for freelancers service and together with SOHO Learning Hub which is an online platform for short courses and both of them aims to be the number one provider in Asia. For growth industries such as E-Sport Authority which is dedicated to providing independent media coverage to all E-Sport News related from around the world and for the art world, there is Atelier Auction which is an investable art auctioneer and being in the art scene for decades.